Dear Mr. Dimon et al.:
You, Gentlemen, are being portrayed in the press as virtual
thieves, acting on the presumption that the property of the corporations you
lead is your personal property and that you are at liberty to decide the
purposes for which that property is used.
See for example, Bloomberg
News of Aug. 19, 2019, which reported (at https://bloom.bg/2zmJF0E):
“Jamie Dimon and
other leaders at some of the world’s largest companies said they plan to
abandon the long-held view that shareholders’ interests should come first amid
growing public discontent over income inequality and the burgeoning cost of
health care and higher education.
“The purpose of a
corporation is to serve all of its constituents, including employees,
customers, investors and society at large, the Business Roundtable said Monday
in a statement. Dimon, the chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
heads the group.” (See https://bloom.bg/2zmJF0E.)
As I stated elsewhere (http://bit.ly/2KTW2aJ),
“It’s difficult to believe that so
many CEOs know so little about economics that they don’t know that in a free
market producing for the profit of their shareholders in and of itself implies
producing for the benefit of everyone.”
What needs to be stressed here, however, is not the apparent
ignorance of the Business Roundtable as it relates to economics but to MORALITY.
As a shareholder myself, both directly and through a
variable annuity, I totally condemn the behavior reported on the part of you
and your colleagues. I, and my fellow shareholders, are the owners of the
property that we have turned over to you to manage for our benefit.
You are employed by us to serve our financial
self-interests, not your personal pleasures, irrespective of the nature of
those pleasures, whether loose women or such things as the furtherance of your
concept of “social justice.”
For the sake of
preserving your reputation as honest businessmen, rather than financial
usurpers and outright thieves, I urge you all immediately to reaffirm
your commitment to the fact that your
job is to improve OUR financial well-being and nothing else.
And to pledge that not a dime of corporate funds will be
spent in the pursuit of any personal value you may have that is not at the same
time a clear means subservient to the enhancement of our financial well-being.
We very much desire that you directly share our financial
self-interests by becoming shareowners yourselves, and we strive to make that
possible by such things as providing you with generous stock options. In other
words, we want you to be rich and welcome your becoming rich.
What we do not welcome and will not tolerate is your seizing
our property to serve purposes other than the one you are employed to achieve, namely,
our greater financial well-being.
Yours truly,
George Reisman, Ph.D.
Pepperdine
University Professor Emeritus of Economics.
Author:
Capitalism: A Treatise
on Economics and other titles (https://amzn.to/2NLvVVZ).
Website: www.capitalism.net.
Blog:
http://georgereismansblog.blogspot.com.
On Twitter @GGReisman
In a world in which there are men and women who do not know to which sex they belong, it should not be surprising that there are corporate CEOs who do not know for whom they work.
Just last week (08/19/19), the CEOs of 181 major corporations agreed that they no longer work simply for their stockholders but also for their “stakeholders,” i.e., for everyone affected by their companies. (See http://bit.ly/2ZaaSD6.)
It’s difficult to believe that so many CEOs know so little about economics that they don’t know that in a free market producing for the profit of their stockholders in and of itself implies producing for the benefit of everyone.
To have customers, you have to produce for their benefit. In fact, you have to give them more benefit for every dollar they spend on your products than they can find anywhere else for those dollars. If you don’t, then they spend them somewhere else.
To have workers, you have to give them more benefit than they can find working anywhere else. If you don’t, they leave you.
Prosperous businesses employing large numbers of workers at competitive wages is the foundation of prosperous towns and cities.
Economic competition in quest of profits operates to the benefit of everyone. It’s actually the mechanism for organizing the process of voluntary social cooperation that is at the heart of the economic system.
(For a full explanation of the benefit of competition, allowing for the fact that people can lose their jobs because of it, see chap. 9 of my book Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics.)
What is so significant about the statement of the CEOs is that it shows to what extent America’s intellectual heritage of the right to the pursuit of happiness (which includes the pursuit of profit) has rotted away and been replaced by a mentality ripe for socialism.
We must keep in mind that as the arbitrary power of the state has grown, businessmen have been put in a position more and more resembling that of hostages held by terrorists.
They are at the point where they attempt to anticipate the wishes of their masters and seek to gratify their masters without being ordered. This also helps to explain their agreement to the document concerning “stakeholders.”
I think it also helps to explain the preference of several major auto companies for the more stringent mileage regulations of California over those proposed by the Trump Administration.
They expect that California’s regulations will ultimately prevail and are afraid to be remembered as “obstructionists” when that time comes.
Finally, we are living in a reign of fear not only with respect to the government itself but also with respect to any private group that can create enough of a social commotion as to threaten possible government action against one, irrespective of the matter.
In this category falls the destruction of careers based on mere accusations, often anonymous and sometimes dating from the last century. The victims of such accusations are regarded as “hot potatoes,” that cannot be touched without danger of getting burned oneself.
It will take a very long time to change this environment. To start changing it, it’s necessary to read and study the works of Mises, Rand, and Reisman. People need to understand how and why socialism is evil and capitalism is good. That essential is what these works demonstrate.
