If
we destroy our ability to produce and operate refrigerators and air
conditioners, we shall be better protected from hot weather than if we retain
and enlarge that ability, environmentalism claims.
If
we destroy our ability to produce and operate tractors and harvesters, to can
and freeze food, to build and operate hospitals and produce medicines, we shall
secure our food supply and our health better than if we retain and enlarge that
ability, environmentalism asserts.
There
is actually a remarkable new principle implied here, concerning how man can
cope with his environment. Instead of our taking action upon nature, as we have
always believed we must do, we shall henceforth control the forces of nature
more to our advantage by means of our inaction.
Indeed,
if we do not act, no significant threatening forces of nature will arise! The threatening
forces of nature are not the product of nature, but of us! Thus, speaks
the environmental movement.
(The above passages are adapted from p. 88 of the author’s Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics, now available in hardcover, paperback, and Kindle editions at https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B001KCWY0Q.)